So, it's NHL trade deadline time. There are tons of rumors flying around involving multiple teams and players, some of which will probably prove to be true.
I've heard Niklas Backstrom (the Minnesota goalie, not the Caps center) and Chris Pronger are on the Caps' list, while Michael Nylander, Karl Alzner and other Caps are on other teams' radars.
I watch a team like Philadelphia beat up the Caps almost every time we play them. I also watch a low-level West-coast team like LA come in and beat the Caps to every loose puck. It seems that, outside Ovechkin and Bradley, the Caps are missing a strong physical aspect to their game. But it also seems, based on the lazy penalties and losing races to pucks, that the Caps also lack speed depth (again, line 1 is OK).
So I'll ask this: What do the Caps need, who do the Caps need, who should go, and who is untouchable?
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Bad Semin, No Biscuit?
Just about every time I watch a Caps game or read a Caps blog, I tend to hear about how the Caps are undisciplined. They are currently 3rd in the league in minor penalties taken, most of which are obstruction penalties (hooking, tripping, holding, interference). Of all the Caps players, one player in particular usually gets the most criticism for ‘taking bad penalties’: Alexander Semin. Let's look at the stats.
In 45 games this season, Semin has taken 22 minor penalties, not including any coincidental penalties that didn’t lead to a power play situation (or 5 minute bongo-playing sessions). Most of Semin’s penalties are hooking (10) or tripping (7) infractions that result from attempting to take the puck from an opposing player. Of those penalties, 7 resulted in the other team scoring a power play goal and only 1 resulted in a game winning power play goal against.
Looking at particular situations, Semin has taken a penalty while on the power play 3 times, negating the man advantage for the Caps. While on the penalty kill, Semin has taken 4 penalties while a man down, resulting in a 5-on-3 situation against the Caps. The opposing team has only scored during 1 of these 5-on-3 situations.
Lastly, when Semin takes a non-coincidental minor penalty in a game, the Caps’ record is 14-3-2. When Semin scores a goal, the Caps are 15-4-1.
Clearly, Alexander Semin is far more important to the Caps when he’s on the ice than in the penalty box. But I don't think his penalties hurt the Caps as much as they're just frustrating to see.
In 45 games this season, Semin has taken 22 minor penalties, not including any coincidental penalties that didn’t lead to a power play situation (or 5 minute bongo-playing sessions). Most of Semin’s penalties are hooking (10) or tripping (7) infractions that result from attempting to take the puck from an opposing player. Of those penalties, 7 resulted in the other team scoring a power play goal and only 1 resulted in a game winning power play goal against.
Looking at particular situations, Semin has taken a penalty while on the power play 3 times, negating the man advantage for the Caps. While on the penalty kill, Semin has taken 4 penalties while a man down, resulting in a 5-on-3 situation against the Caps. The opposing team has only scored during 1 of these 5-on-3 situations.
Lastly, when Semin takes a non-coincidental minor penalty in a game, the Caps’ record is 14-3-2. When Semin scores a goal, the Caps are 15-4-1.
Clearly, Alexander Semin is far more important to the Caps when he’s on the ice than in the penalty box. But I don't think his penalties hurt the Caps as much as they're just frustrating to see.
NHL
With the NHL trade deadline arriving in a few days, I've decided I'm going to talk about the big leagues for a while. Pardon my infatuation with all things Washington Capitals for a few days.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Biomechanics
Biomechanics is the application of mechanical principles to living organisms.
I consider myself a bit of a geek when it comes to mechanical systems. I love figuring out how things work and why and I tend to apply that inquisitive part of me in analyzing all things sports related. I try to break down simple motions into even simpler motions to answer questions about the motion.
In hockey, I'm constantly deconstructing the strides, shots, turns and passes of myself and others in order to correct flaws or simply get better. As I haven't been able to shoot a puck over 100 mph, clearly I have some more work to do.
I recently read an article about a baseball pitcher, 2008 Cy Young Award winner Tim Lincecum. Lincecum, you see is only 5'10" tall and weighs only 175 pounds, but is somehow able to throw a baseball 97 mph. It's not a fluke though. Lincecum has a unique delivery; he drives hard off his back leg and severely torques his body, allowing him to accelerate his arm without putting stress on his shoulder.
The article gets pretty deep into the study of sports biomechanics and, while it deals entirely with baseball pitchers, much of the science can be directly related to hockey. It's a fascinating read...I highly recommend it.
Then again, I geek out over this stuff.
Snapper
I pulled the following description from Wikipedia:
I tend to agree with everything about that statement, except the bold portion. In recent years, the term “half slap shot” has referred to a shot that resembles a slap shot, but with only half the wind-up (or the knee-high wind-up).
A snap shot is a far different animal. I like to use a face off dot as the representation of my wind-up space. With the puck in the center of the dot, my stick blade will stay within the diameter of the face-off dot and will get no higher than 4 or 5 inches from the ice.
You may be asking yourself “how do you generate any speed with that small a wind-up?” The answer is simpler than it sounds. 1) Speed is generated through the hips and lower torso. My weight is transferred from my back leg, driving my hip forward. Essentially, my lower body is rotating while my upper body is still. This generated torque between my lower body and torso. My upper body wants to rotate to catch up to my lower body, and accelerates to do so. With very little input (so far!) from my arms, my hands are already moving quickly. 2) I lower my shoulder and drive the toe of the stick into the ice. As stiff as they seem, all components of a stick flex when weight is applied. The stick blade flexes and flattens out for a split-second when it makes contact with the ice. The shaft of the stick also flexes, albeit not as severely as a slap shot will. The shaft and blade quickly snap back into position and helps accelerate the puck even more. The snap shot finishes with the same motion of a wrist shot; a snap of the wrists and a hard pull with the top hand, which turns the stick blade over.
A good, hard snap shot is a very hard shot for a goalie to pick up. It has no wind up, like with a wrist shot or slap shot, and it is as accurate as a wrist shot while being only slightly slower than a slap shot.
The snap shot is accomplished with a quick snap of the wrists while the puck rests in place. The difference between a snap shot and a wrist shot is that the hockey blade is accelerated towards the puck from a small distance behind it. This allows the player to flex the shaft on the ice and strike the puck at speed -- although not to the degree of a full slap shot…The stick is usually not lifted higher than the knee during the shot.
I tend to agree with everything about that statement, except the bold portion. In recent years, the term “half slap shot” has referred to a shot that resembles a slap shot, but with only half the wind-up (or the knee-high wind-up).
A snap shot is a far different animal. I like to use a face off dot as the representation of my wind-up space. With the puck in the center of the dot, my stick blade will stay within the diameter of the face-off dot and will get no higher than 4 or 5 inches from the ice.
You may be asking yourself “how do you generate any speed with that small a wind-up?” The answer is simpler than it sounds. 1) Speed is generated through the hips and lower torso. My weight is transferred from my back leg, driving my hip forward. Essentially, my lower body is rotating while my upper body is still. This generated torque between my lower body and torso. My upper body wants to rotate to catch up to my lower body, and accelerates to do so. With very little input (so far!) from my arms, my hands are already moving quickly. 2) I lower my shoulder and drive the toe of the stick into the ice. As stiff as they seem, all components of a stick flex when weight is applied. The stick blade flexes and flattens out for a split-second when it makes contact with the ice. The shaft of the stick also flexes, albeit not as severely as a slap shot will. The shaft and blade quickly snap back into position and helps accelerate the puck even more. The snap shot finishes with the same motion of a wrist shot; a snap of the wrists and a hard pull with the top hand, which turns the stick blade over.
A good, hard snap shot is a very hard shot for a goalie to pick up. It has no wind up, like with a wrist shot or slap shot, and it is as accurate as a wrist shot while being only slightly slower than a slap shot.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Big Heart Ted
Ever since Ted Leonsis, owner of the Washington Capitals, bought the team, he's been a passionate voice for hockey in the DC area. I genuinely believe that he loves hockey and his team and wants it to succeed.
That said, the man is also a terrific human being, as seen in this first-hand account by Tarik El-Bashir of the Washington Post.
If you see him walking the halls the next time you take in a Caps game, shake his hand for this rather than for bringing back good hockey to the area.
That said, the man is also a terrific human being, as seen in this first-hand account by Tarik El-Bashir of the Washington Post.
If you see him walking the halls the next time you take in a Caps game, shake his hand for this rather than for bringing back good hockey to the area.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Constructive Criticism
I was sent this article by a friend and fellow hockey player. The article is entitled "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments" and it is an incredibly interesting read. Here's a quick excerpt from the abstract:
In coaching, we're constantly finding ourselves faced with the opportunity to provide constructive criticism to a student in order to increase the player's skill set. Often, we see that advice abandoned because the player 'already knows how to' perform the particular skill.
Constructive criticism can come in many forms, from a simple 'try it this way' to a red 'X' on a test. Both provide you with feedback on your actions or knowledge of a subject and you can learn a lot from both, IF you're open to the criticism.
A 'wrong' often teaches you more than a 'right', but you first need to be able to acknowledge the wrong and ask 'why?' and 'how do I get to right?' That's where learning truly begins.
People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability.
In coaching, we're constantly finding ourselves faced with the opportunity to provide constructive criticism to a student in order to increase the player's skill set. Often, we see that advice abandoned because the player 'already knows how to' perform the particular skill.
Constructive criticism can come in many forms, from a simple 'try it this way' to a red 'X' on a test. Both provide you with feedback on your actions or knowledge of a subject and you can learn a lot from both, IF you're open to the criticism.
A 'wrong' often teaches you more than a 'right', but you first need to be able to acknowledge the wrong and ask 'why?' and 'how do I get to right?' That's where learning truly begins.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)