People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability.
In coaching, we're constantly finding ourselves faced with the opportunity to provide constructive criticism to a student in order to increase the player's skill set. Often, we see that advice abandoned because the player 'already knows how to' perform the particular skill.
Constructive criticism can come in many forms, from a simple 'try it this way' to a red 'X' on a test. Both provide you with feedback on your actions or knowledge of a subject and you can learn a lot from both, IF you're open to the criticism.
A 'wrong' often teaches you more than a 'right', but you first need to be able to acknowledge the wrong and ask 'why?' and 'how do I get to right?' That's where learning truly begins.
I prefer to be told to "Stop sucking" or "Stop being such a pansy" ;-)
ReplyDelete